URTH |
From: "Robert Borski" <rborski@coredcs.com> Subject: (urth) St. Paul & the Werwolf Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 23:25:51 Over the years I've recommended quite a few of Gene Wolfe's short stories to my stauncher Catholic acquaintances, citing New Testament readings as collateral gloss. "The Detective of Dreams," for example, draws much from the Gospels of Mathew and Mark, while "Silhouette" obtains from the Gospel of John and the Pseudepigrapha. But the story I recommend most often is "The Werwolf as Hero," not only because it's a fun read, but because I feel much of it is based on the writings of St. Paul, perhaps the Catholic Church's most important personage after Christ. Paul, our titular hero, is symbolically innocent when we first meet him, although he will receive wisdom in the course of the narrative. This is signaled by the very first sentence of the story, where an owl shrieks and Paul flinches. Notice as well how Paul derives from the Latin word for 'small' and the way he is sitting, with his knees together (the virgin position), while later, when he contemplates luring potential victims he considers crying like an infant (significantly, however, he rejects this notion and plans on using a silver bell, a much more Christian image). The victims in this case are the new stewards of Earth, the so-called Masters, genetically re-engineered humans, whereas Paul and his kind have remained true human. Paul's last name is Gorou, which derives from the French word for werewolf, loup-garou; minus the 'loup,' gorou/garou can be taken to mean 'man.' (Paul is also the Son of Man, i.e., Jesus Christ, especially in the last scene. It's also extremely worth noting that the Greek word for wolf, lukos, is frequently confused with the Greek word for light, leukos. In fact, I submit this difference in a single *e* is why Wolfe uses the variant spelling of werwolf). These so-called Masters also revere science over religion, as witness the four-dimensional diorama built to Hugo de Vries, the father of mutation, who undergoes, as Paul watches, death, "rots" and then is reborn in the manner of Christ (although "rots" conveys the truer nature of de Vries' artificial resurrection). Paul's stalking of Masters might also be considered a parallel to St. Paul's persecution of Christians, whom he considered traitors to Judaism, at least until he himself converted. But just as Paul is about to attack his two victims--a fat man and a woman wearing a dress "of flowering vines the color of love" (the flowering vines may represent orchids, research on which allowed de Vries to formulate his theories on mutation; they also represent sexuality, as does the serpent of gold supporting the woman's breasts)--two other figures join the scene, a grey-haired man named Emmit Pendleton and his young daughter Janey. The trio of humans kill the two Masters, but a quarrel breaks out after the slayings as to how they will divvy up the goods. Paul is also immediately attracted to Janey (he senses her "femaleness, the woman-rut"), symbolizing his growth from childhood to adolescence. But Paul and the Pendletons soon part, each with a dead Master, although already Paul is contemplating life with Janey. (Note however how Paul mentions the dead male Master's meat will be tainted by his testicles i.e., sexuality spoils corporeal worth). Then in one of the story's more surprising moments the dead woman Paul is carrying speaks to him. This symbolizes a false resurrection (cf. the de Vries diorama scene), and eventually the woman will be totally dead, but the scene also conveys several important plotpoints. Asks the woman of Paul: "How come you didn't change? When the rest changed their genes?" Paul's reply: "We didn't want to. We are the human beings." Thus some choice has been involved with his remaining human (unlike the Pendletons who have had changing withheld from them). The woman also tells Paul she and the other dead Master were not married. It's important as well to notice how her eyes' growing opaqueness signifies the imminence of true death. Libidinously aroused by Janey, however, Paul delays eating the dead Master and instead goes looking for the Pendleton's lair, which he finds in an old bus. Notice how Paul's house has a turret, with its association of churchliness (it's also respected by the Masters, who fear destroying it "will bring back the old times"), while Janey's father calls their home "a dump." The bus also stinks of blood (an image of death). Emmit Pendleton subsequently begins to fill Paul in on his family's background and one of the things we learn right away is that the Pendletons have been rejected as candidates for gene therapy/mutation because they carry potentially deleterious genes (do bad genes equal original sin?); thus their humanity has nothing to do with choice, it's theirs by circumstance; i.e., to bring in the Christian parallel, they are not believers by choice, but falsely so, by omission. Now consider the name Emmit. Emmet (its closest cognate) derives from the Hebrew word for truth. Notice again the missing signal *e.* Emmit, I submit, means 'false truth.' As for Pendleton, pendle = pendant (OED), and a pendant weighing a ton recalls the millstone of Bibilical provenance ("Whoso shall offend one of the little ones which believe in me [remember Paul means small], it were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea"). Emmit also mentions a previous suitor of Janey's--"Nice fellow, a German. Name was Curtain--something like that." I submit the word Emmit means is 'kirchen,' German for churches. The suitor in question, despite having been promised Janey's hand, has never returned, symbolizing God's withdrawal. Then there are the chickens the Pendleton's used to raise for their livelihood; all of them have died of sickness, and if we accept the egg as a potent sign of rebirth, this symbolizes their failed rebirth as humans. Then there are a number of images that play off of blindness. Perhaps it's best at this point to remind everyone that St. Paul was struck blind, but recovered and converted to Christianity. Remember the pearl-colored eyes of the Masters, as well as the growing ocular opaqueness of the dead woman Paul has killed? Emmit's sister Clara (despite her name) is born blind in one eye, and later Janey will have to be veiled because there is "a blankness of eye" to her that betrays her as non-Master. All of these symbolize the Pendletons' inability to see (i.e., believe in and accept God). Lastly, notice how machines tear up the Pendletons' farm the night before Xmas and how a brother named Tom has his leg impaled by a two-by-four (read Crucifixion), whereupon "rot" sets in (cf. the de Vries diorama), and he dies. Almost all of the Pendleton family history is tied up in images of blindness, death and oblivion. But does this in turn mean they can never achieve salvation? Not in the Catholic religion, and even Emmit seems to realize he's made mistakes, as he confesses to Paul, "Even a bad man can love his child." Also notice how Wolfe describes Paul in the very next paragraph as he and Janey leave together. "*Her husband* took Janey and led her out of the ruined bus." (Italics mine.) This very obviously is meant to recall St. Paul's oft-quoted dictum from 1 Corinthians 7:9: "It is better to marry than to burn;" i.e., sex outside of marriage will lead to hell; and recall now the fate of the female Master who specifically mentions not being married to the fat man she accompanied. No consummation between the new Mr. and Mrs. Gorou takes place, although in the very next scene Janey is wearing a grotesque parody of a wedding dress, complete with red veil. Here she is less Little Red Riding Hood and more the Scarlet Whore of Babylon ('lupa' in Latin means both she-wolf and prostitute), and she and Paul manage to trap a potential victim in a downshaft. It's important to note here Janey's physical (as opposed to spiritual) hunger as she takes the lead in chasing after the boy; Janey also has no dialogue in the entire story, although she does moan and sob, and she delights in cutting up her victims while they're still alive, recalling animals who play with their prey like cats. All these images play to her unredeemed bestial nature. But then something miraculous of a sort happens. Paul is trapped in a closing door by his foot, like an animal in a trap, and Janey must gnaw his foot to the bone so he can escape. Her concern, in other words, has turned to the altruistic, to something other than satisfying her baser needs, and this is symbolized by the act she ritualistically performs on her husband, not of eating meat, but freeing him from the fleshly bonds that constrain him. I'd also be remiss if I didn't mention the Eucharistic significance of this. The last image we have of Janey then recalls Mary Magdalen (another reformed 'lupa') washing the feet of our Lord: "Over the pain he could feel the hot tears washing the blood from his foot." Lukos has now become leukos. Redemption has been achieved and both Paul and Janey may yet know God. My very last words on their salvation? Forever and ever amen. Robert Borski/scolex (who's surprised he can spell his own name correctly, having gotten Delage wrong every time in his previous post) *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/