URTH |
From: "Jonathan Laidlow" <LAIDLOJM@hhs.bham.ac.uk> Subject: (urth) terminus est Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 17:25:06 GMT Just because the Biblical and historical evidence does not support our reading of 'Terminus Est' as a deliberate echo of the Latin translations of the Biblical 'Consumatum Est'/It is finished, surely that does not mean that 'Terminus Est' does not deliberately echo Jesus' words, albeit in a different language. Surely the eclectic religious symbolism used in the Book supports this. Its not as strong a point as the original one that there is a direct correlation, but I believe the general point is sound. Or am I missing the point somewhat? Jonathan ******************************************************** Jonathan Laidlow Dept of English - staff pigeonholes University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT, England 0121 414 5976 *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/