URTH |
From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis@sirius.com> Subject: (urth) those high fliers Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 17:12:57 Eep! I hope my joke didn't misfire so completely that umbrage occured. I'm too fond of that phrase, "Everything you know is wrong," but not in the put-down way, rather in the way of the snake-oil salesman pitch. Anywho, since Wolfe was so anti-antigravity in 5HC, I personally find myself less concerned with the motive force of the fliers (as I wrote before, I first or second thought of magnetic monopoles, especially in light of "magnetic sails" [which are like solar sails but they respond to magnetic forces rather than photons; and might be used for planetary liftoff if the flipping over part can be controlled], and then picked up "legitimate" antigravity notions from Forward, which in turn makes me laugh) than I am concerned with _the anchor ropes that tether the fliers to the ground_. But every reader finds some different angle or detail to worry about, this is a given. . . . like, if Urth receives barely enough solar insolation to maintain habitability, then how does Verthandi manage to survive with even _less_ insolation? With a Barsoomian brand atmosphere plant, naturally. =mantis= *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/