URTH |
From: Alex David Groce <Alex_Groce@gs246.sp.cs.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: (urth) Zoroastrianism? Buddhism? Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 14:19:44 >Of course, as you point out reality can always break through cliche. That's >true, but difficult. Doesn't Shadow somewhere near the beginning have a >remark to the effect that concepts are much weaker than the words we use to >bind them? (Sorry for not looking it up. My copy has unaccountably vanished). >The theme of innovation and experience versus tradition and ritual runs >through all five Urth books. I'm not sure what the reference is to--Severian's statement about symbols (the "We believe we create symbols..."), perhaps? At any rate, as usual Wolfe is not presenting a simple black/white dichotomy between innovation and experience and "cliches". Vodalus is, in a real sense, the "innovator" as opposed to the Autarch. But Vodalus' "reach for the stars, reclaim the future" turns out to be a false coin, at best a weak parody of Typhon's malignant grandness, used as a tool both by the Autarch and by Erebus and Abaia. The torturer's guild is another prime example--the best of it is what remains of ancient traditions--the feast of St. Catherine, etc. On the other hand, Severian's purpose in many ways seems to be to discover the points where the Increate's Reality shines through the fabric of life on Urth, and the good traditions arise from these direct experiences of a higher order. The textual similarity to the Buddhist texts is striking. I'm just wondering what Wolfe's aims were--maybe nothing more complicated than suggesting that just as Communism can be seen as a secular parody of Christianity, it can be seen as a secular parody of elements of Buddhism as well. "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." John 8:32 -- Alex David Groce (agroce+@cs.cmu.edu) Ph.D. Student, Carnegie Mellon University - Computer Science Department 8112 Wean Hall (412)-268-3066 http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agroce *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/