From: "Daniel Fusch" <dfusch@hotmail.com>
Subject: (urth) Greetings!
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 13:43:32 PDT

Hello.

This is my first post to this list. I first came across The Book of the New 
Sun two years ago, at the recommendation of a literary agent, and I have 
been hooked ever since. (How could I not be? What an astounding book!) I 
think my favorite parts of the book are the vast vistas and varied 
encounters in "The Sword of the Lictor." Especially the cliff near Casdoe's 
house. And Mount Typhon. And...

But I can go on like that for a long while. Dr. Talos remains an extremely 
memorable character in my mind (but then, so do most of the characters), and 
the storytelling contest in the fourth volume is excellent (I'm partial to 
Hallvard's story myself, but I like the fact that Severian does NOT end up 
judging the stories--they are all left on an equal footing).

And, of course, Severian's encounter with Rudesind the curator in volume 
one...where he (Severian) sees the picture of the armored warrior (what 
subtlety!) and longs to set it against a tree, with its frame resting on the 
grass.

And the sequence of short scenes when Severian is walking beside the sea 
near the end of the fourth volume...

and and and....

Well, from a brief glance at the URTH archives, I can see that there is a 
great deal of discussion on this mailing list. I'm looking forward to it!

First, as a newbie, may I toss out a few questions?

1. I have to admit I am puzzled by the miracle of Apu-Punchau. Wolfe (in his 
usual fashion) tells us that the attentive reader might well be able to come 
up with one or two plausible explanations, but I find myself at a loss to 
come up with anything particularly plausible. Help! (I keep thinking this 
should be a simple one.) Does anyone have any suggestions?

2. I have heard it said that Severian may be an unreliable narrator. I can 
think of a few slight inconsistencies in his narrative that might support 
this. Has anyone discussed this subject in detail? Could anyone provide me 
with some examples of the (alleged) unreliability of Severian?

For one thing, I notice that Severian often "leaves out" some small detail 
of the plot, which is mentioned later. This does not make him intentionally 
deceptive, perhaps--since it may be that Severian does not himself consider 
these details of importance at the time, or else he might assume that the 
reader does not need to be told these details explicitly, since he has 
dropped hints--but it does make him an unreliable narrator in the technical 
sense. (It also makes him an even more interesting narrator!) I am thinking 
of A) the fact that Severian does not mention the healing of the man-ape's 
hewed hand at that point in the plot, but he alludes to it later, and B) the 
fact that Severian does not mention his physical intimacy with Thecla at 
that point in the narrative, although he alludes to it in "Claw" and 
"Sword."

Thoughts, anyone?

3. I'm curious...has anyone pondered the question of how closely (or in what 
ways) Wolfe's character of the Cumaean corresponds to the Cumaean in 
Virgil's Aeneid? (I ask because I have not yet read the Aeneid; it is on my 
list of books to read over Christmas break--a very long list!) As far as I 
know, the Cumaean in "The Aeneid" advises Aeneas in the matter of descending 
to hell and returning ("hoc opus, hic labor est"). The connection of Aeneas' 
descent to the hell with Severian's encounter with Apu-Punchau seems (to me, 
at first glance) tenuous at best. Any thoughts?


Also, a comment....

I received my copy of Andre-Driussi's "Lexicon Urthus" only this last week, 
and I've had fun looking through it! The section on "onomastics" was 
enlightening, and the section on Terminus Est was especially interesting. 
Along the lines of Terminus Est as Excalibur, might I volunteer a few 
thoughts? These associations may be unfounded, but still, I think the topic 
begs for such connections!

Here are my suggestions:

Agia, in a sense, serves the role of Morgan le Fay. In a sense. She schemes 
to obtain Terminus Est, as Morgan le Fay schemes to obtain Terminus Est. 
Agilus is somewhat like Sir Accolon (I believe that was the name), who 
jousted with Arthur (with the sword Excalibur at stake, though Arthur did 
not know it).

Of course, these connections break down with any deeper analysis. For one, 
Terminus Est is not involved in the combat at the Sanguinary Fields; both 
Severian and Agilus wield averns. On the other hand, one might recall that 
Sir Accolon (if that was his name) had superior weaponry in the combat with 
Arthur, since he wielded Excalibur...in secret. Similarly, Agilus holds an 
unfair advantage at the Sanguinary Fields, since Severian's avern works 
against him.

Secondly, Agia is not a sorceress, though she nearly "bewitches" Severian.

Still, I think there might be some slight connection there, if only an 
unconscious one.

Any thoughts?

Anyway, I'm glad I found this forum!


Sincerely,

Daniel Fusch

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/