URTH |
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:11:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael StraightSubject: Re: (urth) Future passed in the New Sun On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Adam Stephanides wrote: > I have a hard time reconciling this reading with the references in the > SHADOW appendix to "a tongue that has not yet achieved existence" (unless we > are supposed to believe that the timelines are so similar that the exact > same languages will develop) and "the posthistoric world." Also, we would > have to accept that some artifacts and even buildings had survived the > singularity, as well as Sev's manuscript. I thought sure those comments in the Appendix were jokes. They made me laugh. -Rostrum --