From: "Andy Robertson"
Subject: Re: (urth) uncut dogs Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:28:30 +0100 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Ellis" > So. I don't really have a theory. It's another of those little bits of 5HC I > keep coming back to and coming back to. An awfully crude queston. When Marsh remarks that the boy is "uncut" and *therefore* when he was with the girl, would "bind", or something like that (sorry I can't lay my hand on my copy of 5HC rigth now) , what the hell is he talking about? "They would bind, I know. I think I would kill them if I found them like that" (from memory) This seems to refer to the way a male dog gets stuck up inside a female one and cannot disengage. I am uncircumsised and I can assure all you prick-trimmed Yanks that nothing like that at all happens. Why did Marsh think this? Does this signal something about Abo sexual behaviour? (Or are there entire realms of sexual experiene I have yet to taste? :-) hartshorn --