From: "Robert Borski"
Subject: Re: (urth) Cim Glowing Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:10:50 -0500 Blattid having rebutted: >I've never read Jubilees, and don't know of any church, or > synagogue, for that matter, which considers it to be canon > (though it is cited in several of the canonical texts...); I > thus claim that my basic statement above (that this is not a > "biblical tradition") stands unaltered. No argument there, and I should probably have used something a little more qualitative like "according to non-canon tradition" or "according to the Book of Jubilees" when I talked about the Qayin-Awan connection. > When you say it is attributed to "the Lawgiver," are you > referring to Moses, or to the Deuteronomist, or ...? To Moses, who supposedly received Jubilees as a revelation from the Angel of the Presence. Robert Borski --