From: "Robert Borski" 
Subject: Re: (urth) Cim Glowing
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:10:50 -0500

Blattid having rebutted:

>I've never read Jubilees, and don't know of any church, or
> synagogue, for that matter, which considers it to be canon
> (though it is cited in several of the canonical texts...); I
> thus claim that my basic statement above (that this is not a
> "biblical tradition") stands unaltered.

No argument there, and I should probably have used something a little more
qualitative like "according to non-canon tradition" or "according to the
Book of Jubilees" when I talked about the Qayin-Awan connection.

> When you say it is attributed to "the Lawgiver," are you
> referring to Moses, or to the Deuteronomist, or ...?

To Moses, who supposedly received Jubilees as a revelation from the Angel of
the Presence.

Robert Borski





--