URTH |
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 21:50:01 -0700 From: Michael Andre-DriussiSubject: Re: (urth) General opinion of Pandora Endy didn't like PANDORA then, and he doesn't like PANDORA now. That's fine. OTOH, PANDORA is in excellent company with CATCHER IN THE RYE! For myself, I like CATCHER better than PANDORA, but I like CATCHER a lot and I like PANDORA okay. Haven't read it in years. As it happens, I know from email that Henry Kaiser reread it just a few weeks ago, and while he feels it is Wolfe-lite (perhaps the lightest of them all), I don't recall any complaints. That it is "Wolfe-lite" is not argued in my recollection. Endy wrote: >My first thought on this book was that GW was playing with his fans. I >could imagine a scene with his publisher where he made a bet that he could >write any drivel and his fans would not only buy it, but find some deep >hidden meaning it that made it better than the literal words on the page. Then again, that's nasty. I wish you hadn't written it. Personally, I think of PANDORA as being in a category with PEACE and THE DEVIL IN A FOREST: Gene Wolfe making an honest attempt at something outside strict f/sf genre, in this case the mystery genre. PEACE was mainstream and DEVIL was young adult (people were recently complaining about PEACE being tagged as a "first" novel, but it was a first "non-genre" novel, and from that vantage point you can see how marketing would remove the qualifiers, with the mainstream hopes and prayers that a big hit would mean that Gene Wolfe would never have to go back to writing that escapist drivel known as "genre" again). Endy wrote: >Both books showed signs of brilliance with interesting sequences of action >or dialogue but would kill the momentum of those moments by slipping back >into teen verbiage singsong nonsense. Did people on this mailing list >generally like or dislike this one? Haven't seen too many opinions >(unless I missed them) when searching the archives. -- What does it matter what =anybody= else says? You hate it. That is your opinion. Tried and tested. Do you want people to tell you that you are an idiot? Do you want people to brow-beat you into reading it again until you like it? Do you want people to tell you that you are a genius for "seeing through all the drivel," for being the brave fellow who says that the emperor has no clothes? Or is it the whole consensus reading thing: where are you in the "herd" . . . middle, fringe, outside? =mantis= SIRIUS FICTION booklets on Gene Wolfe, John Crowley Lexicon Urthus out of print! http://www.siriusfiction.com/ --