<--prev V207 next-->
From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes"
Subject: (urth) Some Scattered Thoughts: some short, one very long.
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:53:59 -0700
1. Silk's relationship with Hyacinth. This simply cannot be understood
outside of the context of the (very short) book of the prophet Hosea
in the Bible. To summarize thematically: Hosea, at God's command,
marries a whore and repeatedly forgives her straying; this is intended
as a metaphor for God's relationship with Israel (and, in Christian
understanding, also for Christ's relationship with the Church).
2. Can someone explain to me why people have trouble believing that
Silk might have gashed his arms in grief? Not only is this clearly
established as a grieving practice in Viron (see, for example,
Orpine's funeral); it is a well established historically as a practice
in the "real" world. And, as Nutria so succintly put it, "I don't
think this skilled auger tried to kill himself and failed."
3. Regarding the identity of Silk and/or his parents ... I wonder if
they might not be Typhon's parents; that is, whether Silk might in
fact be a clone taken from Typhon's own cells? Consider Typhon's
concern for the "face of command" which drives him to the whole-head
transplant, with all its inconveniences, he chooses over a simple
brain transplant. Is it possible, or even likely, that Typhon's own
success is due to the "leader" geneplex which marks Silk out? Might
not Typhon have wanted his own "face of command" back when he became
incarnate again at the starcrosser's arrival? And would a "better"
person grown from the same biogenetic substrate not be the ideal
persona to blend with the dead-alive Pas, to bring him back to full
life in Mainframe? This is just a hunch, but it seems worth exploring.
(Later: Just saw Mantis' suggestion that they might be the mortal
versions of Kypris and Pas. Interesting ... and it would also provide
a way of conveying Pas's geneplex for leadership to his next body.)
4. (This is the very long one.)
No, Nutria, there is _not_ -- at this point, anyway -- a consensus
that Horn is moved into Babbie at the end of OBW. There is some
evidence that he is moved (or copied) to Babbie, possibly/probably at
that point, but no certainty by any means, and strong evidence that
the Horn persona is still present e.g. when Hide recognizes his father
in the Narrator during his (Hide's) first astral trip to Green.
I'm beginning to think I see a way out of this maze, but it's kind of
complicated.
What is moved from Horn's body to Silk's? Is it his "soul"? His
"spirit" (which is spoken of several times through the course of the
Books)? A "memory stream," as someone put it recently? A
"personality"? Or ...?
*
* *
One of the great problems facing any serious soulist today is the
increasingly clear evidence of how much of memory and behavior is
organic in behavior.
Suppose George takes a blow to the head and loses all his memory; when
he regains consciousness, he is in essence a new person, and the
personality he exhibits is quite different. Now, is there a new soul
inhabiting or animating this body? Or is the "soul" something quite
different from (conscious) memory and (the external manifestations of)
personality? This is important to any soulist -- such as Wolfe, or
myself -- trying to understand just what this "immortal part" _is_.
Consider, similarly, someone who suffers a less extreme cranial
trauma. He retains all memory, but is drastically changed -- there are
cases of a "normal" person becoming antisocial, even vicious, after a
head blow. This is extremely problematic for the soulist: if physical
trauma can cause a person to become thus loveless and (at least
outwardly) sinful, is the soul thereby damned, though there is no free
choice? A radical Calvinist _might_ have no problem with this; most
other Christians are made a bit more uncomfortable when the problem is
stated thus baldly.
Taking this as a starting place, we can begin to see the Books (all
three of them) as, in part at least, an exploration of what these
various things -- soul, spirit, memory, personality -- are and how
they relate.
*
* *
In tBotNS, the most conspicuous explorations of these questions are
the various memory-transfers using the analeptic alzabo; the alzabo
itself; and Jonas.
In the general use of the analeptic alzabo, memories and nothing more
seem to be transferred to the eater from the eaten.
In the special case of Severian and Thecla, it _appears_ that he (who
has shown a propensity for resurrecting the dead) actually brings her
soul or spirit or whatever to codwell in his body; however, this may
be no more than an appearance: it may simply be that he (who also has
a particularly strong capacity for memory) is an unusually fit
receptacle for memory. Yet, once or twice, he speaks in Thecla's
persona, and once or twice, someone sees a woman "with" him who seems
to be Thecla. So that's ambiguous, at least for now.
The alzabo itself seems to be better "adapted" than the general run of
humans for absorbing devoured memories, which is sensible enough given
its apparent evolutionary strategy. This adaptation is good enough
that (like Severian with Thecla) it actually seems to incarnate the
personality of its victims, to the point where, having devoured and
"become" the father of little Severian, it willingly(?) sacrifices
itself to save its "wife" and "child." To some extent, then, the
personality of the victim is more in control than that of the alzabo
itself which, presumably, would not care about them except as food.
(Actually, the two personalities seem almost perfectly blended in the
nocturnal standoff, when the alzabo's hunger and the man's desire to
be reunited with his wife seek the same physical result, the
assimilation of the wife.)
Finally there is Jonas: who is the first person(ality) we know of, in
the Books, to leap from one body to another -- he seems to possess the
body of Miles in much the way that Horn will later possess that of
Silk, although with far less reason/excuse given for it. The
personality of the resurrected Miles does not really seem all that
much like Jonas, but occasionally exhibits bits of Jonasosity, to the
point where Severian is, at last, able to recognize his presence. In
the event, the Jonas persona seems to flee upon being told that
Jolenta is dead.
What I'm looking at here is a possible comparison to the relationship
between Horn and Silk in the person of the Narrator. In both cases, a
new personality is grafted into a severely damaged person (in the case
of the Narrator, it's Silk's "spirit" which is severely damaged rather
than his body, which is moderately damaged). Over time, the primary
personality seems to heal and, at last, the grafted personality
leaves.
Obviously there are remarkable differences -- for example, that the
grafted personality is the "foreground" personality in the case of the
Narrator but the "background" personality in the case of Miles-Jonas.
But the similarities are interesting enough to bear in mind as we move
forward.
*
* *
I'm running out of time for this right now. Let me summarize:
In tBotSS, we need to examine (at least) the translation of Typhon and
his friends-and-relations to Mainframe; "divine" possession; Mucor;
Silk's vision of his parents; and the rather horrible "afterlife"
Mainframe seems to give to the people of the _Whorl_.
In tBotLS, we have to add the nature and interrelationships between
Silk, Horn, "the Narrator," Pig, Babbie, and Pas; Scylla-in-Oreb; the
nature of inhumi intelligence and personality; astral travel by
inhumu; and possibly some understanding of what and where the
Neighbors are.
*
* *
My tentative conclusions are as follows. Note that for all these, the
implicit condition is "in the Lupiverse" (which we may regard as
related to the "real" universe by virtue of this being [my guesses at]
Wolfe's speculations about how it "really" works).
1. "Soul" and/or "spirit" may or may not be the same thing, but they
are clearly NOT the same as "brain data" about memory and personality -- the
latter being what is transferred to Mainframe or in the
mechanism of the alzabo. (An extraordinarily important piece of
evidence here is Pig's ability to "see" Mucor even though he can't
synch with Mainframe.)
2. Memory/personality "brain data" affect, and are affected by, "soul/
spirit." There is clearly a relationship between these (at least) two
things, but what that relationship is is, thus far, not clear.
3. I _think_ that what is transferred from Horn to the Narrator is of
the nature of soul/spirit, rather than "brain data" as such: which
implies that soul/spirit in fact carries memory with it, independent
of the physical "brain data" memory. (This is, for the soullist, a
somewhat comforting way of thinking about it.)
More? Probably. Later.
--Blattid
--
<--prev V207 next-->