URTH |
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 08:59:10 -0400 From: Ian LamontSubject: (urth) Out of the office (was Re: Digest from urth@urth.net) --=====================_550551==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 07:57 PM 9/2/02 -0400, you wrote: >Message-ID: <019e01c2521c$941cea00$d5456c42@akt> >From: "Alice K. Turner" >To: >Subject: Re: (urth) Newt's main referent >Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:03:41 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > >Good call, Nick. Some major convention (WorldCon, I guess) was held in, I >think, Atlanta in the 80s and Newt, for reasons that I think had to do with >Bruce Sterling, was the banquet speaker. Though I'm not much of a >conventioneer, I attended this (my parents lived in Atlanta) as a friend of >Lucius Shepard, and, though I never met him there, I'm pretty sure Wolfe was >on hand. I'd only barely heard of Gingrich at that point. But, among the >more politicially minded, there was much furor, and a contingent, including >Lucius (but not me), ostentatiously walked out of the banquet as Gingrich >was introduced. Can't remember much about the speech or the evening >otherwise except that both were boring--but that you expect. Gingrich seemed >more menacing later, but that was the explicit SF connection. (Sorry to be >so vague on particulars, but I've sort of accidentally attended a few >conventions or parts of them; the only ones I remember well are those I'd >planned in advance, and this was a last-minute thing--if it wasn't Atlanta I >apologize, but it was somewhere else I just happened to be for other >reasons.) > >-alga > > > > Considering when EXODUS FROM THE LONG SUN was being > > written (1994-5), Councillor Newt has a pretty obvious > > real-life referent: Newt Gingrich, elected Speaker of > > the US House of Representatives after the unexpected > > Republican congressional election victories of > > November 1994. From what we see of Newt, the > > resemblance is pretty profound... > > > > --Nick Gevers. > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > > http://uk.my.yahoo.com > > > > -- > > > > > >-- >Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 01:16:54 -0400 (EDT) >From: Michael Straight >To: urth@urth.net >Subject: Re: (urth) Newt's main referent >Message-ID: >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > >On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Alice K. Turner wrote: > > > Good call, Nick. Some major convention (WorldCon, I guess) was held in, I > > think, Atlanta in the 80s and Newt, for reasons that I think had to do with > > Bruce Sterling, was the banquet speaker. > >Also, at the time, Newt was one of the most famous science-fiction writers >in America (along with William Shatner and, arguably, Stephen King). > >-Rostrum > > > >-- >Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 01:29:43 -0700 >From: maa32 >Subject: (urth) male hyacinth >Sender: maa32 >To: urth@urth.net >Message-id: <3D737498@webmail.nau.edu> >MIME-version: 1.0 >Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > >A couple months ago I posted on the evidence for a male hyacinth, and I was >taken aback to discover that someone else thought that up independently - it >was kind of a joke. Let me briefly go over why I thought so: right before >Silk meets Hyacinth for the first time, he finds all kinds of statues of boy >toys for the gods: Ganymede and Catamitus, both boy lovers that I normally >associate with Musk. But Hyacinthus is the same kind of mythic figure: male >lover of Apollo, stricken dead by the jealous wind. But instead of Musk, he >immediately meets Hyacinth, who has fake breasts. Then later, in Calde of >the >Long Sun ,Patera Quetzal, when Silk claims that he slept with a woman, >says he >doesn't believe that his augur has done that. It sounds like nothing, but >Wolfe has a ton of those double entendres in his work. I'm just surprised >that someone else came up with the same thematic idea - the evidence isn't as >sketchy as the evidence that suggest that Patera Pike is Blood's father, but >it's pretty sketchy. I don't see the chem part as convincing, but I think >Hyacinth could certainly be an ex-male who had a little transformation >enacted >and it explains the sterility of Silk's relationship. >I don't know how seriously to take these things, really. Not as seriously as >a take a lot of the other stuff I post. >Marc Aramini > > > >-- >From: matthew.malthouse@guardian.co.uk >To: urth@urth.net >Message-ID: <80256C28.0036FA7B.00@ldnmta01.guardian.co.uk> >Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:34:24 +0100 >Subject: Re: FW: (urth) FW: Elucidations of the Long Sun:Hyacinth >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > > > > >On 31/08/2002 19:24:14 Andy Robertson wrote: > > >Is it really possible that all the discussions on this list have been >this > >loony, and it is only now I come back after some time away that I am able >to > >judge them properly? :-) > >A break does provide one with perspective, does it not? ;-) > >Matthew > > > >-- >Message-ID: <007301c25251$02914a60$f3919ed9@abcomcus> >From: "Andy Robertson" >To: >Subject: Re: FW: (urth) FW: Elucidations of the Long Sun:Hyacinth >Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:18:54 +0100 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > >Ah well, I love it anyway. But the idea that Hyacinth is a transsexual bio >does seem slightly more probable, I confess: though I really see no need for >it. > > hartshorn > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: >To: >Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 10:34 AM >Subject: Re: FW: (urth) FW: Elucidations of the Long Sun:Hyacinth > > > > > > > > > > On 31/08/2002 19:24:14 Andy Robertson wrote: > > > > >Is it really possible that all the discussions on this list have been > > this > > >loony, and it is only now I come back after some time away that I am able > > to > > >judge them properly? :-) > > > > A break does provide one with perspective, does it not? ;-) > > > > Matthew > > > > >-- >From: matthew.malthouse@guardian.co.uk >To: urth@urth.net >Message-ID: <80256C28.0038FC81.00@ldnmta01.guardian.co.uk> >Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:56:20 +0100 >Subject: Re: (urth) male hyacinth >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > > > > >On 02/09/2002 09:29:43 maa32 wrote: > > >A couple months ago I posted on the evidence for a male hyacinth, and I >was > >taken aback to discover that someone else thought that up independently - >it > >was kind of a joke. Let me briefly go over why I thought so: right >before > >Silk meets Hyacinth for the first time, he finds all kinds of statues of >boy > >toys for the gods: Ganymede and Catamitus, both boy lovers that I >normally > >associate with Musk. But Hyacinthus is the same kind of mythic figure: >male > >lover of Apollo, stricken dead by the jealous wind. But instead of Musk, >he > >immediately meets Hyacinth, who has fake breasts. > >I too the statuary, Hyacinth's potential androgeny etc as re-inforcement >of Musk's character and lifestyle. I'm far from convinced that - even >with Wolfe's infamous multi-layered work - there's any need to see more to >it than that. > >If one posits that Hyacinth is ex-male, male , chem male or female one has >to answer what purpose it serves. More what purpose would it serve to >have Silk fall in love with such a being. That would seem contrary to >Wolfe's normal path in such matters and would require explanation. > >Matthew > > > >-- I am on vacation during the last week of August. I will get back to you after I return on Labor Day. Thanks, Ian Lamont Assistant Web Site Manager Harvard Alumni Affairs and Development Office 124 Mount Auburn Street Cambridge, MA 02138 Tel: (617) 495-8183 Fax: (617) 495-0521 -- --=====================_550551==_.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" I am on vacation during the last week of August. I will get back to you after I return on Labor Day. At 07:57 PM 9/2/02 -0400, you wrote:Message-ID: <019e01c2521c$941cea00$d5456c42@akt>From: "Alice K. Turner" <aturner6@nyc.rr.com>To: <urth@urth.net>Subject: Re: (urth) Newt's main referentDate: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:03:41 -0400MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitReply-To: urth@urth.net
Good call, Nick. Some major convention (WorldCon, I guess) was held in, Ithink, Atlanta in the 80s and Newt, for reasons that I think had to do withBruce Sterling, was the banquet speaker. Though I'm not much of aconventioneer, I attended this (my parents lived in Atlanta) as a friend ofLucius Shepard, and, though I never met him there, I'm pretty sure Wolfe wason hand. I'd only barely heard of Gingrich at that point. But, among themore politicially minded, there was much furor, and a contingent, includingLucius (but not me), ostentatiously walked out of the banquet as Gingrichwas introduced. Can't remember much about the speech or the eveningotherwise except that both were boring--but that you expect. Gingrich seemedmore menacing later, but that was the explicit SF connection. (Sorry to beso vague on particulars, but I've sort of accidentally attended a fewconventions or parts of them; the only ones I remember well are those I'dplanned in advance, and this was a last-minute thing--if it wasn't Atlanta Iapologize, but it was somewhere else I just happened to be for otherreasons.)
-alga
> Considering when EXODUS FROM THE LONG SUN was being> written (1994-5), Councillor Newt has a pretty obvious> real-life referent: Newt Gingrich, elected Speaker of> the US House of Representatives after the unexpected> Republican congressional election victories of> November 1994. From what we see of Newt, the> resemblance is pretty profound...>> --Nick Gevers.>> __________________________________________________> Do You Yahoo!?> Everything you'll ever need on one web page> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts>> --http://www.urth.net/> To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.net>
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.netDate: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 01:16:54 -0400 (EDT)From: Michael Straight <straight@email.unc.edu>To: urth@urth.netSubject: Re: (urth) Newt's main referentMessage-ID: <Pine.A41.4.44+UNC.0209020103420.26648-100000@login0.isis.unc.edu>MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCIIReply-To: urth@urth.net
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Alice K. Turner wrote:
> Good call, Nick. Some major convention (WorldCon, I guess) was held in, I> think, Atlanta in the 80s and Newt, for reasons that I think had to do with> Bruce Sterling, was the banquet speaker.
Also, at the time, Newt was one of the most famous science-fiction writersin America (along with William Shatner and, arguably, Stephen King).
-Rostrum
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.netDate: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 01:29:43 -0700From: maa32 <maa32@dana.ucc.nau.edu>Subject: (urth) male hyacinthSender: maa32 <maa32@dana.ucc.nau.edu>To: urth@urth.netMessage-id: <3D737498@webmail.nau.edu>MIME-version: 1.0Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1Content-transfer-encoding: 7BITReply-To: urth@urth.net
A couple months ago I posted on the evidence for a male hyacinth, and I wastaken aback to discover that someone else thought that up independently - itwas kind of a joke. Let me briefly go over why I thought so: right beforeSilk meets Hyacinth for the first time, he finds all kinds of statues of boytoys for the gods: Ganymede and Catamitus, both boy lovers that I normallyassociate with Musk. But Hyacinthus is the same kind of mythic figure: malelover of Apollo, stricken dead by the jealous wind. But instead of Musk, heimmediately meets Hyacinth, who has fake breasts. Then later, in Calde of theLong Sun ,Patera Quetzal, when Silk claims that he slept with a woman, says hedoesn't believe that his augur has done that. It sounds like nothing, butWolfe has a ton of those double entendres in his work. I'm just surprisedthat someone else came up with the same thematic idea - the evidence isn't assketchy as the evidence that suggest that Patera Pike is Blood's father, butit's pretty sketchy. I don't see the chem part as convincing, but I thinkHyacinth could certainly be an ex-male who had a little transformation enactedand it explains the sterility of Silk's relationship.I don't know how seriously to take these things, really. Not as seriously asa take a lot of the other stuff I post.Marc Aramini
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.netFrom: matthew.malthouse@guardian.co.ukTo: urth@urth.netMessage-ID: <80256C28.0036FA7B.00@ldnmta01.guardian.co.uk>Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:34:24 +0100Subject: Re: FW: (urth) FW: Elucidations of the Long Sun:HyacinthMime-Version: 1.0Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-asciiReply-To: urth@urth.net
On 31/08/2002 19:24:14 Andy Robertson wrote:
>Is it really possible that all the discussions on this list have beenthis>loony, and it is only now I come back after some time away that I am ableto>judge them properly? :-)
A break does provide one with perspective, does it not? ;-)
Matthew
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.netMessage-ID: <007301c25251$02914a60$f3919ed9@abcomcus>From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson@clara.co.uk>To: <urth@urth.net>Subject: Re: FW: (urth) FW: Elucidations of the Long Sun:HyacinthDate: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:18:54 +0100MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitReply-To: urth@urth.net
Ah well, I love it anyway. But the idea that Hyacinth is a transsexual biodoes seem slightly more probable, I confess: though I really see no need forit.
hartshorn
----- Original Message -----From: <matthew.malthouse@guardian.co.uk>To: <urth@urth.net>Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 10:34 AMSubject: Re: FW: (urth) FW: Elucidations of the Long Sun:Hyacinth
>>>> On 31/08/2002 19:24:14 Andy Robertson wrote:>> >Is it really possible that all the discussions on this list have been> this> >loony, and it is only now I come back after some time away that I am able> to> >judge them properly? :-)>> A break does provide one with perspective, does it not? ;-)>> Matthew>
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.netFrom: matthew.malthouse@guardian.co.ukTo: urth@urth.netMessage-ID: <80256C28.0038FC81.00@ldnmta01.guardian.co.uk>Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:56:20 +0100Subject: Re: (urth) male hyacinthMime-Version: 1.0Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-asciiReply-To: urth@urth.net
On 02/09/2002 09:29:43 maa32 wrote:
>A couple months ago I posted on the evidence for a male hyacinth, and Iwas>taken aback to discover that someone else thought that up independently -it>was kind of a joke. Let me briefly go over why I thought so: rightbefore>Silk meets Hyacinth for the first time, he finds all kinds of statues ofboy>toys for the gods: Ganymede and Catamitus, both boy lovers that Inormally>associate with Musk. But Hyacinthus is the same kind of mythic figure:male>lover of Apollo, stricken dead by the jealous wind. But instead of Musk,he>immediately meets Hyacinth, who has fake breasts.
I too the statuary, Hyacinth's potential androgeny etc as re-inforcementof Musk's character and lifestyle. I'm far from convinced that - evenwith Wolfe's infamous multi-layered work - there's any need to see more toit than that.
If one posits that Hyacinth is ex-male, male , chem male or female one hasto answer what purpose it serves. More what purpose would it serve tohave Silk fall in love with such a being. That would seem contrary toWolfe's normal path in such matters and would require explanation.
Matthew
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.net
Thanks,
Ian Lamont
Assistant Web Site Manager
Harvard Alumni Affairs and Development Office
124 Mount Auburn Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
Tel: (617) 495-8183
Fax: (617) 495-0521 --=====================_550551==_.ALT--