URTH |
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 22:36:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael StraightSubject: Re: (urth) Those chems On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Roy C. Lackey wrote: > 'You said that you were not a chem. I'm not one of those ignorant and > prejudiced bios who consider themselves superior to chems, but I know--' > 'You lie!'" > > Then Lemur pitched a fit and fired the azoth. (LS2, 12) He didn't want to > admit that he was a chem because he was aware of the prejudice, and even > seems to have shared it. Yeah, but knowing human beings, that prejudice could easily exist whether there was any basis for it or not. You could re-write that substituting whites, blacks, and the accusation that a man who looked white had some black ancestry, and you'd have a conversation that would have represented the attitudes of a whole lot of real-world people a hundred years ago. But I wouldn't site that fact as evidence that blacks aren't really sentient. -Rostrum --