URTH |
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 21:15:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Bratt IanSubject: Re: (urth) Chem power On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Roy C. Lackey wrote: > "Five chains away, the blade of the azoth wrecked a fusion generator, > and the soldier whose heart it had been died." (LS3, 9) > > But, but . . . that's just another good reason to shoot those fool engineers > who designed them! If chems were subject to exploding and raining > radioactive material all around when they died, then they were a hazard to > every bio around them, including their fellow human troopers. Dumb. But > then, Typhon didn't care about people, did he? > > -Roy A quick technical point: Roy, you seem to be confusing fission and fusion. Fission, what powers modern power plants, is the process of massive nuclei breaking apart and releasing energy. Radioactivity is a natural byproduct of this process. Fusion, however, is the process of lighter nuclei fusing together to make a more massive nuclei. Large amounts of energy are released during fusion, but with significantly less radioactive emissions (on order of 10^9 less than fission). http://wwwofe.er.doe.gov/More_HTML/Comparison_w_fission.GIF Unfortunately for society, commercially available fusion generators are still science fiction. I don't think those "fool engineers" would appreciate you being so trigger happy :) Cheers, Ian --