URTH |
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:15:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Jerry FriedmanSubject: Re: (urth) chem slavery and bio slavery --- "Roy C. Lackey" wrote: > Jerry Friedman quotes and writes: > > >> The chems didn't follow the bios to Blue > >> and Green--the subject never even came up. They had been built to > last > >> about two-hundred-and-fifty years, the intended duration of the > voyage > >> of > >> the _Whorl_. Planned obsolescence. When the trip was finished, so > were > >> they. > >... > > > >I generally agree with your point about how the chems were thought > >of when the _Whorl_ was created, and I thank for you for all this > >bits of evidence of prejudice on both sides. I have a quibble with > >the above, though. Marble was taken to Blue, and isn't Cijfer a > >chem? Outside of New Viron, we may not know about some characters > >whether they're chems or not. > > Marble ending up on Blue was a fluke; as Mucor's guardian she was just > in > the right place at the right time, and being the calde's friend didn't > hurt. Cijfer was married to Wijzer, who was a bio, so I don't think she > was a chem. Apparently I was confused. There is an odd sentence in Ch. 7 of RttW in which Silkhorn says that if Cijfer were an inhuma, she wouldn't have covered the comatose Jahlee's face or summoned a *bio*. Why "bio" instead of "human", unless Cijfer isn't a bio? But aside from that and possibly her name, there doesn't seem to be any suggestion that she's a chem, and her being married to Wijzer isn't the only suggestion that she's a bio. And I was mixed up about who Cijfer was and thinking of a conversation that turned out not to exist. Wait a second--could Wijzer be a chem? Probably not... Thanks for the correction. ... Jerry Friedman __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com --