URTH |
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:57:08 -0800 (PST) From: Jerry FriedmanSubject: Re: (urth) horn + horn, sev + sev --- Don Doggett wrote: > Marc writes: > > However, if we accept that Severian can become a > > vanished person, then this response is not absurd. > > I think it only stands to reason that Severian would become a vanished > person if Blue is Ushas. Remember in Apu Punchau's tomb when the > Hierodules > explain to Severian that even though he was an eidolon, as he took in > the > food and water and air of his environment it would be incorporated into > his > body and make it real? Severian would most certainly evolve with his > surroundings and whatever created the polyploidy in all the other > creatures > would affect him as well. The other Severian's are perhaps visitors > from > the corridors of time. Just thought I'd mention that polyploidy is a red herring. It means having a multiple (by an integer greater than 1) of the usual number of chromosomes. It has nothing to do with the number of limbs in animals. Hypothetical plant-animal hybrids might have a full set of chromosomes from each parent, I guess, but I don't think that would be called polyploidy. I'm not refuting claims that Blue is Ushas, felwolves are descended from wolves (or wolfs), and the like (though those claims seem very unlikely to me--in contrast to the claim that something is very weird, possibly sentient, about the trees). I'm just saying that "polyploidy" isn't the word you want. For those who believe that the Bluvian animals were produced by doubling limbs, eyes, and whatever of Urth animals, can some Greek scholar come up with the word? Dimerization? Jerry Friedman __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com --