From: matthew.malthouse@guardian.co.uk
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 09:56:44 +0000
Subject: RE: (urth) probable distance from Urth to Bleen




On 02/12/2002 20:19:19 James Wynn wrote:

>Nice caluculations Mantis, however if one insists that Silk's Time
coexists
>with Severian's Time then these numbers won't do. Wolfe puts Severian's
time
>1000 to 2000 years after Typhon's.

Ummmm......     And the quotes that establish this are?

Somewhere amongst the papers on my desks are the notes I took on last
reading regarding time and chronology.  I'll try and dig them out.

Matthew



--