URTH |
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:40:51 -0800 From: Michael Andre-DriussiSubject: Re: (urth) Wintry thoughts on Wolfe To begin, I did not intend to badger Adam Stephanides at all, and if that is how it was taken by anybody then I apologize. Alga wrote: >Gosh, I think it would be difficult to find a book of any genre that >portrays domestic love more eloquently than LITTLE, BIG. Sure Smoky strays >with Sophie, but can anyone doubt his long-term devotion to Daily Alice? And >as for short-term romantic obsession, well, holy Toledo, who in the hell >beats Rush with Once a Day, Auberon with Sylvie, Pierce with Rose, even, >more diffidently Spofford with Rosie? Of course I thought of these examples, too, but I thought that, for example, Rush and Once a Day (of ENGINE SUMMER) might be already ruled out by Adam's knock against "obsessive love" wrt TAD and TBOTLS. In fact, I sense that the situation in TAD might be very much like the situation in not only ENGINE SUMMER but also LITTLE, BIG. Here is what Adam wrote: >Something else that contributes to my sense of Wolfe's bleakness is the >absence of love from his works. Does any of his major novels have a >protagonist who is genuinely capable of loving another individual (as >distinct from compassion)? The closest, perhaps, are Green in TAD and Silk >in BOTLS, but there's something obsessive about both these loves: neither >Green nor Silk really knows the woman he "loves," and I don't think either >of them is really interested in knowing her as a person. (Though it's been >a long time since I've read BOTLS.) Horn's love for Nettle is unconvincing, >and his feelings for Seawrack and Jahlee are more like lust than love; and >Severian, Weer, and the protagonists of 5HC all seem incapable of love. >Wolfe is a great writer, but his emotional range is limited. If by using "genuine love" Adam means "domestic love," that would be an important step to establish (and it could well be the case, given the particular singling out of Horn and Nettle). Yes, this would rule out ENGINE SUMMER, pretty much, and LITTLE, BIG would probably be king. I think it was Crush who offered a list of mainly supporting characters (except for Latro) showing love: they may be good examples, but Adam is talking specifically about main characters. A possible strike against Latro might well be the lack of domesticity; the fact that he only loves her for one of the two books; or any number of reasons I couldn't hope to enumerate. But you know? It really =is= easier to just say, "'Every man to his taste,' as the farmer said when he kissed the cow." Or just shrug and move on. =mantis= --