Subject: Re: (urth) Crowley, then ...
From: Josh Geller 
Date: 27 Jul 2003 10:15:52 -0700

On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 09:38, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:

> I don't mean the story: I was able to follow that well enough, and more or 
> less glom onto what it's about, but ... what's the _point_?

> Can someone tell me what I've missed here?

Which part don't you get?


J.

___



--