Subject: Re: (urth) Typhon's folly?
From: matthew.malthouse@guardian.co.uk
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:18:14 +0100

On 09/09/2003 16:45:48 "James Wynn" wrote:

>It's possibly due to my naivet=E9 in practical science, but it never struc=
k=20
me
>as awkward.

It could cause me to revise my conception of the Urth universe.  You can=20
be sure I find that damn akward!  :-)


Matthew

--