URTH |
From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy@siebel.com> Subject: RE: (whorl) OBW: Horn and Silk Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 12:37:17 Rostrum a ecrit: > I'd appreciate if responses avoided spoilers for IGJ. > If applicable, you could just say, "IGJ contradicts your theory." > > I think this is the best book Wolfe has written. IGJ contradicts your theory 8*) > There is much left unanswered and more to Horn's story, but we do have > Horn making a pact with the Neighbors, arriving at Pajaracu, flying away > on the lander, liberating it from the inhumi with Sinew, being reconciled > with Krait as he dies fighting to save Horn, saving Gaon, and escaping to > rejoin his family. That's a lot more than we could say at the end of > Shadow or Nightside. Here I want to disagree strenuously. By the end of _Shadow_, Severian has told us at least twice that he is become Autarch; drowned and been resurrected; been exiled for his crime against the guild; received his two talismans, the Claw and Terminus Est; met most of the Book's major characters, including (in no special order) Dorcas, Agia, Vodalus, Thecla, Thea, Dr. Talos, Baldanders, the Autarch, Jolenta, the aquastors, and the bride of Abaia; raised at least one person from the dead, fought a duel, died and been raised again himself; made love to his own grandmaw; and exercised his Art. _Nightside_ is a bit slower, but I think a longish list of major developments could be made -- just not by me today. > I had seen bits of discussion on the list about Horn being in Silk's > body, or subsuming some part of Silk into himself before reading the > book, but even with that possiblity in my head as I read, I didn't > think that was right. IGJ probably contradicts your theory, but this is Wolfe, so who can say for certain? But there is strong evidence. I'll shut up about that now. > I'll start at the end. Horn says he's not ashamed of what > he's accomplished: "I have snatched the ball and won the game." > What a wonderful line. [...] surely Horn is speaking > metaphorically [...] _If_ you should prove to be right about Horn and Silk, your interpretation would be brilliant. As it is, even if you are wrong, your interpretation is still quite valid: there is no need to limit the remark to one meaning or the other. Horn can be Silk (in some sense) and _still_ have the metaphor in mind _also_. Nice call. > I'll be reading IGJ soon, so I'll be able to catch up with the > rest of the discussion. I'll be happy if it's half as good as > OBW! You will be ecstatic. --Dan'l *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun. *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/ *To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request@lists.best.com *If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth@lists.best.com