URTH |
From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy@siebel.com> Subject: RE: (whorl) Re:Denial as a Literary Structure Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:14:07 Patrick O'Leary wrote: > While we shouldn't worship of the text, (Torah, Torah, Torah) I > think we have to give Wolfe the benefit of a doubt. (In my > considered opinion the man does not make aesthetic mistakes. He > makes philosophical/ narrative choices which we may or may not > agree with, may or may not like, may or may not be moved by. And, > of course, he makes typos. Errors of a different order.) Thank you. This was pretty much my point a few days ago when I suggested that we need to live with SHORT a while (I said a year, others exaggerated it to 'years') before rushing to judge it as a failure. If we've learned one thing about Mr Wolfe's books over the last twenty years or so, it's that they do not yield themselves to a single reading, or to quick analysis. We are still learning important things about 5HC, NEW, and (especially?) PEACE. Given that, it seems to me that a book by Mr Wolfe which seems unsatisfactory on the first reading -- and, by the by, that was my reaction: I was disappointed by RttW -- should probably be shelved and read again some time later. (Certainly this has worked for me with CASTLEVIEW; I admit I can't answer all the questions some have asked about it, but I feel confident that they are in some sense answerable.) Certain things have become much clearer to me about SHORT in the course of these discussions, most of which I've already stated in brief at one point or another. Thanks to this, I think I'll be ready to reread SHORT much sooner than I was ready to re-tackle PEACE or CASTLEVIEW. (I'm still not quite ready to revisit PANDORA, though...) --Dan'l *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun. *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/ *To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request@lists.best.com *If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth@lists.best.com