<--prev V22 next-->
From: Nigel Price <NigelPrice1@compuserve.com>
Subject: (urth) Wright Rebuttal
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 19:29:29
(Sorry, there is some lupine comment in this posting, but there's a bit of
scene setting to be got through as well first...)
I recently sent off to America for Mantis' splendid collection of lupine
booklets. He responded very quickly to my order, and the booklets arrived
here in Wiltshire, England, in yesterday's post. Since then I have been
studying them with a great deal of pleasure, and accordingly decided to
write an e-mail to Mantis to thank him for being willing to share his
scholarship with other Wolfe enthusiasts in this way.
My message began as follows:
Hi Michael!
Just to let you know that your consignment of Gene Wolfe
booklets arrived safely in yesterday's post and I've been
greedily devouring their contents ever since. Thank you
for making the fruits of your long labours available to
others in this way.
I was particularly impressed by your synopsis of TBotNS
and TUotNS. Reading it all through brought back a little of
the sheer joy and wonder of Wolfe's convoluted, and, indeed,
involuted narrative. Time and again, my reaction was
something along the lines of, "So *that's* what happened
- that's what I *thought* happened, but it seemed so strange
that at the time I read it that I wondered whether I'd
misunderstood!"
I have recently been corresponding with <very kind and
scholarly member of the Urth and Whorl lists> and he has
been kind enough to send me copies of various reviews
and critical essays on Wolfe, and amongst these was a
copy of your piece in Foundation 66, entitled
"Gene Wolfe at the Lake of Birds". I very much enjoyed
reading this, and found your tracing of the various
interwoven references and allusions in "The Shadow of
the Torturer" most illuminating.
In contrast, I found the two extracts from Peter Wright's
thesis on Wolfe that were published in the same edition
of Foundation much more problematic...
Ever prompt, Mantis replied this evening as follows:
Thanks for all your comments on "Lake of Birds" and
Peter Wright's essays! Please consider posting them to
the list, especially the Wright stuff, since more-than-you-
might-guess have read those essays (and =everybody=
should have a copy of "Foundation No. 66," yet
without a doubt there are some who know not of its
existence) and who knows, they might be prodded into
coughing up some sort of dialog.
Since you've already done the writing it is easy to upload,
and you can share your work.
OK, this is what I wrote:
In contrast (to Mantis' essay on The Lake of Birds), I found
the two extracts from Peter Wright's thesis on Wolfe that
were published in the same edition of Foundation much
more problematic. Although there was much to admire,
especially, for instance, in his discussion of the way that
Severian's "perfect" memory serves to overwhelm
significant information with an excess of circumstantial
and associative detail, I was ultimately unconvinced by
his theory that the book is a disguised account of a
cosmic evolutionary conspiracy. Clearly, he is right to
emphasise the role of the hierogrammates and their
plans as shaping forces behind many of the events of
Severian's narrative, and I agree that the references to plays
and puppetry throughout the narrative are highly
suggestive of the covert manipulation going on.
For all that, Wright's analysis seems far too reductive.
In stressing Severian's suitability for becoming the
progenitor of the New Sun because the hieros
produced the hierogrammates by "torturing" other
species, he seems to ignore the fact that Severian was
a failure as a torturer. That, after all, was why he was
exiled from his guild in the first place. His life is
characterised by humanity as well as rigour, and surely
it is this balance that ultimately qualifies him for both
the office of Autarch and his ultimate destiny as bringer
of the New Sun.
Again, Wright correctly emphasises that the coming of
the New Sun results in Urth's destruction through
inundation, but ignores both the terminal decadence
and decline of Urth society and the fact that it is in any
case doomed to imminent extinction anyway when the
old sun finally dies, as the view of the "Ragnarok"
timeline from the Last House makes clear. Wolfe has
spoken in interviews of Urth's decline as brought about
by a failure of ambition, energy and moral courage.
Urth of the Commonwealth is a society in the grip of
social as well as physical entropy.
Wright's interpretation of Severian's story is that it shows
how religious and mythological narrative and imagery are
cynically exploited by an alien race who use Severian as
their puppet and destroy Urth in order to ensure their own
creation. I would say that the narrative is much more
ambiguous than that. Part of Wolfe's achievement seems
to be to show how religious and mythological structures
can be embodied in rational structures of physical cause
and effect without losing their mythical or religious
significance. If Severian ensures the existence of the
hierogrammates, he does also save the Urth from heat
death and extinction. If the "second coming" of the
Conciliator is the result of time travel, then it is still a real
parousia, and genuinely results in a judgement and the
effective creation of a new heaven and a new earth - or
"Urth".
<Spoiler warning for anyone who has not yet read the
Long Sun series!>
In so far as Wolfe's other works can, as Wright asserts,
be regarded as commentaries on Severian's story, then
it seems significant that in the Long Sun books, while
Silk discovers that the religion that is so important to him
is as manufactured as the world/Whorl in which he lives,
he also receives enlightenment from The Outsider, who
may well be the "real" God of Christian belief. The Book
of the Long Sun is about a false and corrupt religion and
its use to manipulate the populace who form the Whorl's
"cargo". But it is also about real faith, and Silk's role in
"saving" his people and bringing them to a better place.
The mythical and the literal themes exist in constant
juxtaposition, but rather than subvert each other, they
reinforce one another. In Wolfe's fiction, reality is shot
through with the significance that it gains from its mythic
resonances, while those same myths are in some
sense realized and fulfilled in the everyday events of the
narrative.
That's certainly how I regard The Book and The Urth of
the New Sun.
Stressing the obfuscatory role of Severian's memory also
fails to give credit to the sheer power of the naturalistic
dimension of Wolfe's narrative. I've always found his
attention to describing the small and most mundane
details of ordinary life deeply moving and strangely
humane amongst much that is often alien and bizarre in
the extreme.
To all this, Mantis commented:
Wright's work is good. I think I agree with you in differing
with his vision of the whole, and in some details, but he
presents it well and backs up everything with text (which
means our differences of opinion often arise out of the
vexing morass of "interpretation"). He seems to steer the
Urth Cycle into the Machievellian territory of Herbert's DUNE
series (but maybe that only came to mind because there
was an essay in the same issue about Herbert's
Machievellian themes!) rather than, say, the PK Dick
region of "Gnostic Truth breaks through."
(Oh look, another Synchronicity Wave is breaking--
vizcacha is suddenly talking about Clute's "Catherine the
Weal"--good time to act, now.)
Plus you really ought to post a list of your recent readings in
essays on Wolfe, just to spread the info on what is there, and help
prod those people (other than myself, honestly!) who desire to
compile annotated bibliographies of secondary material.
Keep up the good work!
Thus encouraged, therefore, I have posted the above for general
consideration, and give my recent lupine reading as follows, with due
thanks to generous photocopiers of reviews and articles (they know who they
are!):
Mantis' (Michael Andre-Driussi) "Lexicon Urthus"
and three individual pamphlet volumes of
"Additions, Errata &cetera"; his indispensible
"Synopsis of the Narrative of Severian the Great";
his two booklets "Languages of the Long Sun Whorl"
and "Characters of the Long Sun Whorl"
Colin Greenland's review of "The Shadow of the Torturer"
and "The Claw of the Conciliator" in Foundation 24.
Douglas Barbour's review of "The Sword of the Lictor"
in Foundation 26.
Paul Park's review of "Nightside the Long Sun" and
"Lake of the Long Sun" in Foundation 60.
Michael Andre-Driussi's essay (Mantis again!)
"Gene Wolfe at the Lake of Birds" in Foundation 66.
Peter Wright's essays "God-Games: Cosmic
Conspiracies and Narrative Sleights in Gene Wolfe's
The Fictions of the New Sun" and "Grasping the
God-Games: Metafictional Keys to the Interpretation
of Gene Wolfe's The Fictions of the New Sun" in
Foundation 66.
John Clute's collected essays on Gene Wolfe in his
his book "Strokes"
Larry McCaffery's essay and interview with Gene Wolfe
in "Across the Wounded Galaxies: Interviews with
Contemporary American Science Fiction Writers"
And, newly arrived from Amazon this morning...
"Gene Wolfe: Urth-Man Extraordinary: A Woking
Bibliography by Phil Stephensen-Payne and
Gordon Benson, Jr."
I've also been downloading various interviews and articles from the web,
but I need to compile a separate list for them. The "Cave Canem" site has
been a fascinating source of essays and lexicographical information on "The
Fifth Head of Cerberus".
Regards
Nigel Price
Minety, Wiltshire
England
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
<--prev V22 next-->