URTH |
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 08:59:06 -0400 From: Ian LamontSubject: (urth) Out of the office (was Re: Digest from urth@urth.net) --=====================_548759==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 07:57 PM 8/26/02 -0400, you wrote: >Message-ID: <004801c24cb7$be21af80$1f3dc6d8@rclackey.stic.net> >From: "Roy C. Lackey" >To: >Subject: Re: (urth) PEACE: 3 Misses >Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 23:19:04 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > >Matthew responding to me: > > >> I can make nothing of "Tyler". > > > >Not having read Peace I have no idea if there's any relevance but the word > >can mean door or gate keeper. Archaic and obsolete except in Masonic > >Lodges where the additional meaning of keeping out the uninitiated applies > >and Tyler is a formal position. To tyle the lodge; bar the doors assured > >that only the aurhorised are within. > >So, Helen Birkhead Tyler yields . . .? > >torch + shininghead (?) + gate keeper(?) > >flame-topped gate keeper? > >Like the cherubim with flaming swords at the gates of Eden, guarding the way >to the tree of life? > >-Roy > > >-- >Message-ID: <14C3784DB7932F458F3A929D779546400235D648@smtexmb02.siebel.com> >From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" >To: "'urth@urth.net'" >Subject: (urth) Coldhouse Banshee >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 09:27:00 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=iso-8859-1 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > >Good heavens ... Stone Ox has brought up a marvellous correspondence, >and then missed something that ... well, I guess it isn't obvious >because I never saw it before either, but somehow it jumped out of >his posting at me: > > > Jack stays in the barn haunted by the banshee three nights. > >...as does the coldhouse prank victim (Friday, Saturday, Sunday nights). > >Okay, then: making the banshee story as abstract as possible... J >wants very badly a treasure in F's possession. F dislikes / looks down >on J / regards J as a poor recipient for the treasure, but for some >reason does not give an outright "No." Instead, he sets J to spend three >nights in a place which should kill him. > >Now, one of the things the embedded stories in PEACE seem to do is to >provide better or happier endings to some of the situations in Weer's >life. So I am moved to speculate that the Coldhouse Prank was not a >prank at all, but a deliberat attempt to keep a "real world" (Weer's >reality) J from acquiring something that a "real world" F did not want >him to have but could not deny him. > >To those for whom the book is fresher in their minds than it is in >mine, then: Do any possible real-world F's and J's come to mind? The >most obvious candidate for F would be Julius, who owns the barn / >coldhouse... is this even plausible? And if so, who would be J? > >(Is this another candidate for when Den "really" died?) > >--Blattid > > >-- >Message-Id: >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:59:19 -0700 >To: urth@urth.net >From: Michael Andre-Driussi >Subject: (urth) Coldhouse Den-die >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > >Blattid, regarding the coldhouse prank death, wrote: > >(Is this another candidate for when Den "really" died?) > >Well, er, yes and no. > >If Weer is lying about his age at the time (invalidating the big anchor for >the current operating timeline), then the coldhouse death could be his own, >just as he might be a dead boy next to his chemistry set. > >(And he would lie about his age ostensibly to distance himself from the >prank if he was the perpetrator, too. In addition to lying about his age >to avoid facing the fact that he himself died there.) > >But if Weer is not lying about his age, and the victim's details are true, >then no, the death cannot be Weer's. > >=mantis= > > > >-- >Message-ID: <14C3784DB7932F458F3A929D779546400235D64E@smtexmb02.siebel.com> >From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" >To: "'urth@urth.net'" >Subject: RE: (urth) Coldhouse Den-die >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:23:21 -0700 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=iso-8859-1 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > > > Blattid, regarding the coldhouse prank death, wrote: > > >(Is this another candidate for when Den "really" died?) > > > > Well, er, yes and no. > > > > If Weer is lying about his age at the time (invalidating the > > big anchor for the current operating timeline), then the > > coldhouse death could be his own, just as he might be a > > dead boy next to his chemistry set. > >Which was in fact my point ... This is just a goof, really, but >it's a stfnal idea that I've played with many time and never >come up with a good storyline for ... I've often had the idea >of, well, if you can have multiple-sheaf futures, why not multiple- >sheaf pasts? And then what if Alden, the Reasonably Friendly Ghost, >actually has lived multiple versions of his life and died at >several different points along the timeline ... ? It would >certainly clear up (by making irrelevant) many of the >inconsistencies in the storyline(s). So he died of a stroke, and >he died playing with his chemistry set, and he died in the >coldhouse prank ... Just a goof, as I said. > >But I'm dead serious about the coldhouse == the barn. > >--Blattid > > >-- >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:27:21 +0000 (GMT) >From: Josh Geller >To: urth@urth.net >Subject: (urth) The Devil In A Forest and St. Olaf of Norway >Message-ID: >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Reply-To: urth@urth.net > > > >The Devil In A Forest is perhaps a minor work, but an extremely >interesting one. > >There's a hamlet in the woods, the woodcutters who are relics of a >previous stage of civilization, a bandit who is a woodcutter aristocrat, a >witch who knows the technology of the old civilization, megalithic ruins >that are 'not a town' etc. > >This is one of the most valuable books for people trying to understand the >old civilization of Europe. > >There's a story about King Olaf the Holy of Norway. See, it was generally >known that he was a reincarnation of Olaf Geirstadtalf, who was buried in >the mound at Geirstadt. There had been a prophecy to the effect, he had >Olaf G.'s sword that came out of the mound etc. The problem was that St. >Olaf was occupied with the forcible Christianization of Norway, and it >sort of looked bad that a Christian king should be an incarnate elf. So >they did a little stage play, where the King and some of his companions >(who would also have been out of the mound, by the old way) went to Olaf >G's mound on horseback and one of the companions asked the King if >he didn't remember when they had been there before, and St. Olaf answered >that it was not possible for a person to live more than once, because you >lived once, died once and were resurrected once on the Last Day. Then he >was overcome with emotion and rode away, because (in my view) what he was >saying was so much at conflict with the reality. > >Wolfe has a good grasp on all of this, as he shows in 'Devil' and also in >the Latro books. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. > > > > >-- I am on vacation during the last week of August. I will get back to you after I return on Labor Day. Thanks, Ian Lamont Assistant Web Site Manager Harvard Alumni Affairs and Development Office 124 Mount Auburn Street Cambridge, MA 02138 Tel: (617) 495-8183 Fax: (617) 495-0521 -- --=====================_548759==_.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" I am on vacation during the last week of August. I will get back to you after I return on Labor Day. At 07:57 PM 8/26/02 -0400, you wrote:Message-ID: <004801c24cb7$be21af80$1f3dc6d8@rclackey.stic.net>From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey@stic.net>To: <urth@urth.net>Subject: Re: (urth) PEACE: 3 MissesDate: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 23:19:04 -0500MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitReply-To: urth@urth.net
Matthew responding to me:
>> I can make nothing of "Tyler".>>Not having read Peace I have no idea if there's any relevance but the word>can mean door or gate keeper. Archaic and obsolete except in Masonic>Lodges where the additional meaning of keeping out the uninitiated applies>and Tyler is a formal position. To tyle the lodge; bar the doors assured>that only the aurhorised are within.
So, Helen Birkhead Tyler yields . . .?
torch + shininghead (?) + gate keeper(?)
flame-topped gate keeper?
Like the cherubim with flaming swords at the gates of Eden, guarding the wayto the tree of life?
-Roy
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.netMessage-ID: <14C3784DB7932F458F3A929D779546400235D648@smtexmb02.siebel.com>From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy@siebel.com>To: "'urth@urth.net'" <urth@urth.net>Subject: (urth) Coldhouse BansheeDate: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 09:27:00 -0700MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitReply-To: urth@urth.net
Good heavens ... Stone Ox has brought up a marvellous correspondence,and then missed something that ... well, I guess it isn't obviousbecause I never saw it before either, but somehow it jumped out ofhis posting at me:
> Jack stays in the barn haunted by the banshee three nights.
...as does the coldhouse prank victim (Friday, Saturday, Sunday nights).
Okay, then: making the banshee story as abstract as possible... Jwants very badly a treasure in F's possession. F dislikes / looks downon J / regards J as a poor recipient for the treasure, but for somereason does not give an outright "No." Instead, he sets J to spend threenights in a place which should kill him.
Now, one of the things the embedded stories in PEACE seem to do is toprovide better or happier endings to some of the situations in Weer'slife. So I am moved to speculate that the Coldhouse Prank was not aprank at all, but a deliberat attempt to keep a "real world" (Weer'sreality) J from acquiring something that a "real world" F did not wanthim to have but could not deny him.
To those for whom the book is fresher in their minds than it is inmine, then: Do any possible real-world F's and J's come to mind? Themost obvious candidate for F would be Julius, who owns the barn /coldhouse... is this even plausible? And if so, who would be J?
(Is this another candidate for when Den "really" died?)
--Blattid
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.netMessage-Id: <v03130302b9901add4af9@[209.179.251.152]>Mime-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:59:19 -0700To: urth@urth.netFrom: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis@siriusfiction.com>Subject: (urth) Coldhouse Den-dieReply-To: urth@urth.net
Blattid, regarding the coldhouse prank death, wrote:>(Is this another candidate for when Den "really" died?)
Well, er, yes and no.
If Weer is lying about his age at the time (invalidating the big anchor forthe current operating timeline), then the coldhouse death could be his own,just as he might be a dead boy next to his chemistry set.
(And he would lie about his age ostensibly to distance himself from theprank if he was the perpetrator, too. In addition to lying about his ageto avoid facing the fact that he himself died there.)
But if Weer is not lying about his age, and the victim's details are true,then no, the death cannot be Weer's.
=mantis=
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.netMessage-ID: <14C3784DB7932F458F3A929D779546400235D64E@smtexmb02.siebel.com>From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy@siebel.com>To: "'urth@urth.net'" <urth@urth.net>Subject: RE: (urth) Coldhouse Den-dieDate: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:23:21 -0700MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitReply-To: urth@urth.net
> Blattid, regarding the coldhouse prank death, wrote:> >(Is this another candidate for when Den "really" died?)>> Well, er, yes and no.>> If Weer is lying about his age at the time (invalidating the> big anchor for the current operating timeline), then the> coldhouse death could be his own, just as he might be a> dead boy next to his chemistry set.
Which was in fact my point ... This is just a goof, really, butit's a stfnal idea that I've played with many time and nevercome up with a good storyline for ... I've often had the ideaof, well, if you can have multiple-sheaf futures, why not multiple-sheaf pasts? And then what if Alden, the Reasonably Friendly Ghost,actually has lived multiple versions of his life and died atseveral different points along the timeline ... ? It wouldcertainly clear up (by making irrelevant) many of theinconsistencies in the storyline(s). So he died of a stroke, andhe died playing with his chemistry set, and he died in thecoldhouse prank ... Just a goof, as I said.
But I'm dead serious about the coldhouse == the barn.
--Blattid
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.netDate: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:27:21 +0000 (GMT)From: Josh Geller <dclxvi@dclxvi.best.vwh.net>To: urth@urth.netSubject: (urth) The Devil In A Forest and St. Olaf of NorwayMessage-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.40.0208261815230.8590-100000@dclxvi.best.vwh.net>MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCIIReply-To: urth@urth.net
The Devil In A Forest is perhaps a minor work, but an extremelyinteresting one.
There's a hamlet in the woods, the woodcutters who are relics of aprevious stage of civilization, a bandit who is a woodcutter aristocrat, awitch who knows the technology of the old civilization, megalithic ruinsthat are 'not a town' etc.
This is one of the most valuable books for people trying to understand theold civilization of Europe.
There's a story about King Olaf the Holy of Norway. See, it was generallyknown that he was a reincarnation of Olaf Geirstadtalf, who was buried inthe mound at Geirstadt. There had been a prophecy to the effect, he hadOlaf G.'s sword that came out of the mound etc. The problem was that St.Olaf was occupied with the forcible Christianization of Norway, and itsort of looked bad that a Christian king should be an incarnate elf. Sothey did a little stage play, where the King and some of his companions(who would also have been out of the mound, by the old way) went to OlafG's mound on horseback and one of the companions asked the King ifhe didn't remember when they had been there before, and St. Olaf answeredthat it was not possible for a person to live more than once, because youlived once, died once and were resurrected once on the Last Day. Then hewas overcome with emotion and rode away, because (in my view) what he wassaying was so much at conflict with the reality.
Wolfe has a good grasp on all of this, as he shows in 'Devil' and also inthe Latro books.
.
--http://www.urth.net/To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request@urth.net
Thanks,
Ian Lamont
Assistant Web Site Manager
Harvard Alumni Affairs and Development Office
124 Mount Auburn Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
Tel: (617) 495-8183
Fax: (617) 495-0521 --=====================_548759==_.ALT--