From: "James Wynn"
Subject: Re: (urth) silk's clean plate Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:31:08 -0500 Oops that was supposed to go to Marc only. I'm not prepared to defend most of this -- that is, not far beyond what I've done so far -- so please don't get too exhuberant in shooting it down. Crush ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Wynn" To: Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 5:11 PM Subject: Re: (urth) silk's clean plate > Marc, > > This is my third attempt at sending this email. Each time I've said, "oh > what's the point" but every time I see your post sitting in my Inbox I start > again. Since you have recently posted that you are re-reading LS, I presumed > with typical narcissism that you are simultaneously considering the validity > of my arguments for Hyacinth being Molybdenum, Silk's Mother, and Tussah. So > I'll add one more angle that I didn't mention before. > > I think the tomatoes are made such a big deal of in LS because the love Silk > that does not extend to Rose is very important thematically. Marble/Rose > told Silk that the reason Rose hated him was because she could see how he > was repulsed by her (chem) prostheses. So it is Silk's ironic damnation to > fall in love with Hyacinth, a chem with biological prostheses -- actually > the same chem (Molybdenum) in both cases. Note that Hy can subtly change her > face and does so to make herself look more like Poppy -- so perhaps she > still has those chem facial implements beneath the skin of her face. > > It all fits sooo nicely. Except for Hyacinth's father with whom I have no > idea what to do. :T > > Anyway, I'd like to know if you come up with anything. > > James (Crush) Wynn > > > > -- --